Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790311›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Glottis Segmentation Failures.

Armin A Dadras, Philipp Aichinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Armin A DadrasSpeech and Hearing Science Lab, Division of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6474-7208
Philipp AichingerSpeech and Hearing Science Lab, Division of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4353-4996

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (FWF) KLI 722-B30Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is crucial for clinical applications, but challenges persist due to noise and variability. In particular, accurate glottis segmentation from high-speed videos is vital for voice research and diagnostics. Manual searching for failed segmentations is labor-intensive, prompting interest in automated methods. This paper proposes the first deep learning approach for detecting faulty glottis segmentations. For this purpose, faulty segmentations are generated by applying both a poorly performing neural network and perturbation procedures to three public datasets. Heavy data augmentations are added to the input until the neural network's performance decreases to the desired mean intersection over union (IoU). Likewise, the perturbation procedure involves a series of image transformations to the original ground truth segmentations in a randomized manner. These data are then used to train a ResNet18 neural network with custom loss functions to predict the IoU scores of faulty segmentations. This value is then thresholded with a fixed IoU of 0.6 for classification, thereby achieving 88.27% classification accuracy with 91.54% specificity. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the presented approach. Contributions include: (i) a knowledge-driven perturbation procedure, (ii) a deep learning framework for scoring and detecting faulty glottis segmentations, and (iii) an evaluation of custom loss functions.

Indexed as

computer visiondeep learningfailure detectionglottis segmentationhigh-speed videolaryngoscopysemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38790311
PMCPMC11118004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.