Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790258›Full record

ReviewGenes2024

Deep Learning for Elucidating Modifications to RNA-Status and Challenges Ahead.

Sarah Rennie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah RennieSection for Computational and RNA Biology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9731-6957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins and chemical modifications to RNA play vital roles in the co- and post-transcriptional regulation of genes. In order to fully decipher their biological roles, it is an essential task to catalogue their precise target locations along with their preferred contexts and sequence-based determinants. Recently, deep learning approaches have significantly advanced in this field. These methods can predict the presence or absence of modification at specific genomic regions based on diverse features, particularly sequence and secondary structure, allowing us to decipher the highly non-linear sequence patterns and structures that underlie site preferences. This article provides an overview of how deep learning is being applied to this area, with a particular focus on the problem of mRNA-RBP binding, while also considering other types of chemical modification to RNA. It discusses how different types of model can handle sequence-based and/or secondary-structure-based inputs, the process of model training, including choice of negative regions and separating sets for testing and training, and offers recommendations for developing biologically relevant models. Finally, it highlights four key areas that are crucial for advancing the field.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messengerdeep learningneural networkspost-transcriptional modificationsRNA-binding proteins (RBPs)sequence motifs

Identifiers

PMID38790258
PMCPMC11121098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.