Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790211›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

MD3F: Multivariate Distance Drift Diffusion Framework for High-Dimensional Datasets.

Jessica Zielinski, Patricia Corby, Alexander V Alekseyenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica ZielinskiDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-8835
Patricia CorbyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Alexander V AlekseyenkoDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

Funding

T-COHR: Training in Craniofacial and Oral Health ResearchT32DE017551 · NIDCR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI YAO, HAI · 2006 to 2025
$10.3M
Distance-based Panomic Analytics for Microbiome DataR01LM012517 · NLM · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ALEKSEYENKO, ALEXANDER V · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE017551NIH HHS 5R01LM012517-04NIH HHS T32DE017551-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional biomedical datasets have become easier to collect in the last two decades with the advent of multi-omic and single-cell experiments. These can generate over 1000 measurements per sample or per cell. More recently, focus has been drawn toward the need for longitudinal datasets, with the appreciation that important dynamic changes occur along transitions between health and disease. Analysis of longitudinal omics data comes with many challenges, including type I error inflation and corresponding loss in power when thousands of hypothesis tests are needed. Multivariate analysis can yield approaches with higher statistical power; however, multivariate methods for longitudinal data are currently limited. We propose a multivariate distance-based drift-diffusion framework (MD3F) to tackle the need for a multivariate approach to longitudinal, high-throughput datasets. We show that MD3F can result in surprisingly simple yet valid and powerful hypothesis testing and estimation approaches using generalized linear models. Through simulation and application studies, we show that MD3F is robust and can offer a broadly applicable method for assessing multivariate dynamics in omics data.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHumansMultivariate Analysisdrift-diffusion modellongitudinal omicsmicrobiomemultivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID38790211
PMCPMC11120789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.