ArticleGenes2024
Comprehensive Genetic Evaluation in Patients with Special Reference to Late-Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing loss (HL) is a common and multi-complex etiological deficit that can occur at any age and can be caused by genetic variants, aging, toxic drugs, noise, injury, viral infection, and other factors. Recently, a high incidence of genetic etiologies in congenital HL has been reported, and the usefulness of genetic testing has been widely accepted in congenital-onset or early-onset HL. In contrast, there have been few comprehensive reports on the relationship between late-onset HL and genetic causes. In this study, we performed next-generation sequencing analysis for 91 HL patients mainly consisting of late-onset HL patients. As a result, we identified 23 possibly disease-causing variants from 29 probands, affording a diagnostic rate for this study of 31.9%. The highest diagnostic rate was observed in the congenital/early-onset group (42.9%), followed by the juvenile/young adult-onset group (31.7%), and the middle-aged/aged-onset group (21.4%). The diagnostic ratio decreased with age; however, genetic etiologies were involved to a considerable degree even in late-onset HL. In particular, the responsible gene variants were found in 19 (55.9%) of 34 patients with a familial history and progressive HL. Therefore, this phenotype is considered to be a good candidate for genetic evaluation based on this diagnostic panel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.