Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790040›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2024

Time to improvement of pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, and disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with tofacitinib: a post hoc analysis.

Victoria Navarro-Compán, Atul Deodhar, Rachid Bahiri, Andrew G Bushmakin, Joseph C Cappelleri, Jihane Rammaoui

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03502616 (A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOFACITINIB IN SUBJECTS WITH ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03502616 phase3completednot on this map

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (as)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2018 to 2020Enrolled270ConditionsAnkylosing SpondylitisArmsTofacitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria Navarro-CompánRheumatology, University Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Atul DeodharDivision of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Rachid BahiriDepartment of Rheumatology, El Ayachi Hospital Medical University, Rabat, Morocco.
Andrew G BushmakinStatistical Research and Data Science Center, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Joseph C CappelleriStatistical Research and Data Science Center, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Jihane RammaouiInnovative Medicines, Emerging markets, AfME, Pfizer Inc, Casablanca, Morocco. Jihane.Rammaoui@pfizer.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Time to improvement in core domains of AS was estimated in tofacitinib-treated patients with AS.

methodsThis post hoc analysis used phase 3 trial data from patients with AS receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo to week (W)16; all patients received open-label tofacitinib W16-48. OUTCOMES: nocturnal pain; total back pain; fatigue, spinal pain, peripheral joint pain/swelling, enthesitis, and morning stiffness (Bath AS Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] questions 1-6); BASDAI total score; AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Median time to improvement events was estimated using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier models. Improvement events were defined as initial (first post-baseline observation) and continued (sustained for 2 consecutive visits) ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% improvement in back/nocturnal pain or BASDAI questions/total scores, or ASDAS improvement ≥ 1.1 and ≥ 2.0 points.

results269 patients (tofacitinib: n = 133; placebo-to-tofacitinib: n = 136) were assessed. Median time to improvement was shorter, and more patients experienced improvements with tofacitinib vs. placebo-to-tofacitinib; differences observed from W2 (first post-baseline assessment). Median time to initial (continued) ≥ 30% pain improvement was 4 (4-8) weeks for tofacitinib vs. 24 (24) weeks for placebo-to-tofacitinib (8 [8] weeks post-switch). Median time to initial (continued) ≥ 50% improvement of pain, peripheral joint pain/swelling and enthesitis, morning stiffness, BASDAI total score, and fatigue was 8-24 (12-40) weeks with tofacitinib vs. 24-32 weeks (32 weeks-not estimable [NE]) with placebo-to-tofacitinib. Median time to initial (continued) ASDAS improvement ≥ 1.1 points was 4 (8) weeks for tofacitinib vs. 24 (24) weeks for placebo-to-tofacitinib, and NE for improvement ≥ 2.0 points with either treatment.

conclusionsImprovements in AS core domains occurred more rapidly with tofacitinib vs. placebo-to-tofacitinib. Half of tofacitinib-treated patients with AS will likely experience improvements ≥ 30% in pain and ≥ 1.1 points in ASDAS during month (M)1, ≥ 50% improvement in nocturnal pain and enthesitis by M2, and in morning stiffness by M3. Results show that initiating tofacitinib as soon as possible is associated with quicker improvements in AS core domains vs. delaying treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03502616, 11 April 2018.

Indexed as

FatiguePiperidinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesSpondylitis, AnkylosingAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainProtein Kinase InhibitorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomePiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinibAnkylosing spondylitisDisease activityFatiguePainPatient-reported outcomesSpondyloarthritisTofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID38790040
PMCPMC11127290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.