Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38790005›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Deep learning of mammogram images to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies: a preliminary study.

Chang Liu, Min Sun, Dooman Arefan, Margarita Zuley, Jules Sumkin, Shandong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chang LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Min SunHillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15215, USA.
Dooman ArefanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Margarita ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jules SumkinDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Shandong WuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. wus3@upmc.edu.

Funding

SCH: Leverage clinical knowledge to augment deep learning analysis of breast imagesR01EB032896 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 mammogram are currently recommended for biopsy. However, 70-80% of the biopsies are negative/benign. In this study, we developed a deep learning classification algorithm on mammogram images to classify BI-RADS 4 suspicious lesions aiming to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 847 patients with a BI-RADS 4 breast lesion that underwent biopsy at a single institution and included 200 invasive breast cancers, 200 ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), 198 pure atypias, 194 benign, and 55 atypias upstaged to malignancy after excisional biopsy. We employed convolutional neural networks to perform 4 binary classification tasks: (I) benign vs. all atypia + invasive + DCIS, aiming to identify the benign cases for whom biopsy may be avoided; (II) benign + pure atypia vs. atypia-upstaged + invasive + DCIS, aiming to reduce excision of atypia that is not upgraded to cancer at surgery; (III) benign vs. each of the other 3 classes individually (atypia, DCIS, invasive), aiming for a precise diagnosis; and (IV) pure atypia vs. atypia-upstaged, aiming to reduce unnecessary excisional biopsies on atypia patients.

resultsA 95% sensitivity for the "higher stage disease" class was ensured for all tasks. The specificity value was 33% in Task I, and 25% in Task II, respectively. In Task III, the respective specificity value was 30% (vs. atypia), 30% (vs. DCIS), and 46% (vs. invasive tumor). In Task IV, the specificity was 35%. The AUC values for the 4 tasks were 0.72, 0.67, 0.70/0.73/0.72, and 0.67, respectively.

conclusionDeep learning of digital mammograms containing BI-RADS 4 findings can identify lesions that may not need breast biopsy, leading to potential reduction of unnecessary procedures and the attendant costs and stress.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyAdultAgedBiopsyBreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnnecessary Procedures

Identifiers

PMID38790005
PMCPMC11127450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.