Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789924›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2024

heredERA Breast Cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of giredestrant plus the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Sherko Kuemmel, Catherine Harper-Wynne, Yeon Hee Park, Fábio Franke, Michelino de Laurentiis, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Daniel Eiger, Sarah Heeson, Andrés Cardona, Özgür Özyilkan and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05296798 (A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Giredestrant in Combination With Phesgo Versus Phesgo After Induction Therapy With Phesgo + Taxane in Patients With Previously Untreated HER2-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Locally-Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05296798 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Giredestrant in Combination With Phesgo Versus Phesgo After Induction Therapy With Phesgo + Taxane in Patients With Previously Untreated HER2-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Locally-Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2022 to 2030Enrolled922ConditionsLocally Advanced or Metastatic Breast CancerArmsPhesgo, Giredestrant, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, LHRH Agonist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sherko KuemmelBreast Unit, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Catherine Harper-WynneKent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, Kent, UK.
Yeon Hee ParkSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Fábio FrankeOncosite, Centro de Pesquisa Clínica Em Oncologia, Ijuí, Brazil.
Michelino de LaurentiisIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione Pascale", Napoli, Italy.
Eva Schumacher-WulfMamma Mia! Breast Cancer Magazine, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel EigerF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Sarah HeesonRoche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, UK.
Andrés CardonaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Özgür ÖzyilkanBaskent University Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
Flavia Morales-VàsquezFUCAM, A.C and Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ciara MetcalfeGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marc HafnerGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Eleonora RestucciaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Joyce O'ShaughnessyBaylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, 3410 Worth Street, Suite 400, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. Joyce.OShaughnessy@usoncology.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HER2+, ER+ BC) is a distinct disease subtype associated with inferior response to chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy compared with HER2+, ER-negative BC. Bi-directional crosstalk leads to cooperation of the HER2 and ER pathways that may drive treatment resistance; thus, simultaneous co-targeting may optimize treatment impact and survival outcomes in patients with HER2+, ER+ BC. First-line (1L) treatment for patients with HER2+ metastatic BC (mBC) is pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxane chemotherapy. In clinical practice, dual HER2 blockade plus a fixed number of chemotherapy cycles are given as induction therapy to maximize tumor response, with subsequent HER2-targeted maintenance treatment given as a more tolerable regimen for long-term disease control. For patients whose tumors co-express ER, maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) can be added, but uptake varies due to lack of data from randomized clinical trials investigating the superiority of maintenance ET plus dual HER2 blockade versus dual HER2 blockade alone. Giredestrant, a novel oral selective ER antagonist and degrader, shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety across phase I-II trials of patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC, with therapeutic potential in those with HER2 co-expression.

methodsThis phase III, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to recruit 812 patients with HER2+, ER+  locally advanced (LA)/mBC into the induction phase (fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] plus a taxane) to enable 730 patients to be randomized 1:1 to the maintenance phase (giredestrant plus PH FDC SC or PH FDC SC [plus optional ET]), stratified by disease site (visceral versus non-visceral), type of LA/metastatic presentation (de novo versus recurrent), best overall response to induction therapy (partial/complete response versus stable disease), and intent to give ET (yes versus no). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. DISCUSSION: heredERA BC will address whether giredestrant plus dual HER2 blockade is superior to dual HER2 blockade alone, to inform the use of this combination in clinical practice for maintenance 1L treatment of patients with HER2+, ER+ LA/mBC.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05296798; registered on March 25, 2022. Protocol version 3.0 (November 18, 2022). SPONSOR: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenTrastuzumabAdultFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespertuzumabReceptors, EstrogenTrastuzumabBreast cancerEstrogen receptor-positiveGiredestrantHER2-positivePertuzumabTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID38789924
PMCPMC11127459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.