Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789913›Full record

ArticlePhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2024

Filling data gaps in long-term solar UV monitoring by statistical imputation methods.

Felix Heinzl, Sebastian Lorenz, Peter Scholz-Kreisel, Daniela Weiskopf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felix HeinzlEffects and Risks of Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, Oberschleissheim, 85764, Germany. fheinzl@bfs.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8648-4397
Sebastian LorenzEffects and Risks of Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, Oberschleissheim, 85764, Germany.
Peter Scholz-KreiselEffects and Risks of Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, Oberschleissheim, 85764, Germany.
Daniela WeiskopfEffects and Risks of Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, Oberschleissheim, 85764, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of long-term time trends of solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation on ground level is of high scientific interest. For this purpose, precise measurements over a long time are necessary. One of the challenges solar UV monitoring faces is the permanent and gap-free data collection over several decades. Data gaps hamper the formation and comparison of monthly or annual means, and, in the worst case, lead to incorrect conclusions in further data evaluation and trend analysis of UV data. For estimating data to fill gaps in long-term UV data series (daily radiant exposure and highest daily irradiance), we developed three statistical imputation methods: a model-based imputation, considering actual local solar radiation conditions using predictors correlated to the local UV values in an empirical model; an average-based imputation based on a statistical approach of averaging available local UV measurement data without predictors; and a mixture of these two imputation methods. A detailed validation demonstrates the superiority of the model-based imputation method. The combined method can be considered the best one in practice. Furthermore, it has been shown that the model-based imputation method can be used as an useful tool to identify systematic errors at and between calibration steps in long-term erythemal UV data series.

Indexed as

Daily erythemal radiant exposureImputationUVIUV monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.