Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789861›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Machine learning-based response assessment in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: radiomics analysis for assessing tumor regression grade using T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.

Yong Dae Lee, Hyug-Gi Kim, Miri Seo, Sung Kyoung Moon, Seong Jin Park, Myung-Won You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yong Dae LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, #23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyug-Gi KimDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, #23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Miri SeoDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Kyoung MoonDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, #23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seong Jin ParkDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, #23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Won YouDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, #23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, 02447, Seoul, Republic of Korea. funfun2020@khu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to assess tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) through a machine learning-based radiomics analysis using baseline T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 148 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer(T2-4 or N+) who underwent MR imaging at baseline and after chemoradiotherapy between January 2010 and May 2021 were included. A region of interest for each tumor mass was drawn by a radiologist on oblique axial T2-weighted images, and main features were selected using principal component analysis after dimension reduction among 116 radiomics and three clinical features. Among eight learning models that were used for prediction model development, the model showing best performance was selected. Treatment responses were classified as either good or poor based on the MR-assessed TRG (mrTRG) and pathologic TRG (pTRG). The model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to classify the response group.

resultsApproximately 49% of the patients were in the good response (GR) group based on mrTRG (73/148) and 26.9% based on pTRG (28/104). The AUCs of clinical data, radiomics models, and combined radiomics with clinical data model for predicting mrTRG were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73, 0.87), 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81), and 0.75(95% CI 0.68, 0.82), and those for predicting pTRG was 0.62 (95% CI 0.52, 0.71), 0.74 (95% CI 0.65, 0.82), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.71, 0.87).

conclusionRadiomics combined with clinical data model using baseline T2-weighted MR images demonstrated feasible diagnostic performance in predicting both MR-assessed and pathologic treatment response in patients with rectal cancer after NCRT.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsROC CurveTreatment OutcomeMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics analysisRectal cancerTreatment response assessmentTumor regression grade

Identifiers

PMID38789861
PMCPMC11126485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.