ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Force Balance Reconstruction of the Orbicularis Oris in Secondary Unilateral Cleft Lip Deformity.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The three-dimensional finite element model of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and mechanical analysis of the oral surfaces.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecondary unilateral cleft lip deformities are commonly observed in patients with cleft lip and traditional surgical methods can't completely tackle this problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a novel surgical technique using force balance reconstruction of the orbicularis oris.
methods53 patients with secondary unilateral cleft lip deformity were included in this study, in which the orbicularis oris muscle was reconstructed symmetrically to achieve optimal force balance. Photometric 2d indexes were employed to evaluate the outcome of 27 patients, and 3d indexes for the remaining 26 patients. Aesthetic evaluation and parent-patient satisfaction surveys were also recorded.
resultsSignificant differences were found in the following: (1) LH (the lip height), LW (the lip width), D1(the vertical distance from the white roll to the vermilion bottom at the christa philtra points) and D2(the vertical distance from the christa philtra points to the facial midline) when comparing preoperative and postoperative 2D images; (2) LH, LW, D1 and D2 when comparing preoperative and follow-up 2D images; (3) RMS (root mean of square) when comparing preoperative and postoperative 3D images. Aesthetic evaluation in the follow-up period was a mean of 4.29, while parent-patient satisfaction of the overall appearance was a mean of 4.41.
conclusionsThe results suggest this new muscle reconstruction technique can significantly improve the surgical outcome of secondary unilateral cleft lip deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ."
Indexed as
Identifiers
38789808What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.