Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789679›Full record

ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2024

A practical approach for anabolic treatment of bone fragility with romosozumab.

L Cianferotti, C Cipriani, A Palermo, O Viapiana, G Zavatta, G Mazziotti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Hypoparathyroidism: Similarities and differences between Western and Eastern countries.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L CianferottiBone Metabolic Diseases Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
C CiprianiDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
A PalermoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
O ViapianaRheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
G ZavattaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes Prevention and Care, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
G MazziottiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 420090, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy. gherardo.mazziotti@hunimed.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRomosozumab, a fully humanized anti-sclerostin-antibody, is a bone-builder stimulating osteoblasts and inhibiting osteoclast by activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin signaling. This unique mechanism of action has the potential to address unmet needs in osteoporosis management.

methodsThe multifaceted practical clinical issues related to romosozumab are discussed, especially focusing on the rationale of employing a sclerostin inhibitor to target bone fragility as first line or second line treatment in post-menopausal osteoporosis and in males at increased risk of fractures.

resultsFour randomized clinical trials with several post-hoc analyses and more than ten observational studies have consistently demonstrated that romosozumab is effective in rapidly increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures in post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures. In male osteoporosis, only data on BMD are available. Noteworthy, romosozumab was shown to be more effective and rapid than teriparatide in improving BMD, bone structure and strength at the hip, especially in women already treated with anti-resorptive drugs. Interestingly, even if romosozumab displays best results in treatment-naïve patients, its favourable effects on BMD were observed even in women previously treated with teriparatide or denosumab, although to a lesser extent.

conclusionsBased on the available evidence, romosozumab could be proposed as ideal drug in several clinical settings, such as non-fractured post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures, patients with recent hip fracture, patients non responder to bisphosphonates and short-term denosumab therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBone DensityAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnabolic AgentsBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleHumansMaleOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnabolic AgentsAntibodies, MonoclonalBone Density Conservation AgentsromosozumabSOST protein, humanBone anabolicsFracturesOsteoporosisRomosozumabSclerostin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.