ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysis of employee diligence and mining of behavioral patterns based on portrait portrayal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the deepening of enterprise digital construction, the portrait portrayal based on employee behaviors has gradually become a research focus. Currently, the employee's portrait portrayal mostly has the problems of simple means, low efficiency, limited solving ability, etc., making the results more one-sided. Therefore, a data mining-based employee portrait portrayal model is proposed. The content of employee portrait portrayal is deeply analyzed, and the overall framework of the model is designed. A diligence analysis model (DAM) based on improved GAN is constructed, and the diligence evaluation of employees is clarified to realize the diligence evaluation. The results of diligence analysis of DAM have high accuracy (80.39%) and outperform SA (70.24%), K-means (51.79%) and GAN (67.25%). The Kappa coefficient of DAM reaches 0.7384, which is highly consistent and higher than SA (0.6075), K-means (0.3711) and GAN (0.5661). The Local Outlier Factor (LOF) and Isolation Forest (IF) are used to detect abnormal behaviors on the employees, and mine the abnormal behavior patterns on different granularity time. The LSTM model (Att-LSTM) based on the attention mechanism is used to complete the prediction of employees' software usage behaviors, and analyze and summarize the characteristics of employee's behaviors from multiple perspectives. Att-LSTM predicts the best with an RMSE of 0.82983, which is better than LSTM (0.90833) and SA (0.97767); AM-LSTM has a MAPE of 0.80323, which is better than LSTM (0.86233) and SA (0.92223). The results show that the data mining-based employee portrait portrayal method can better solve the problem of enterprise employees' digital construction, and provide a new way of thinking for the construction of enterprise-level employees' digital portrait model and the analysis of employee behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.