Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Fungal diversity differences in the indoor dust microbiome from built environments on earth and in space.

Nicholas Nastasi, Sarah R Haines, Ashleigh Bope, Marit E Meyer, John M Horack, Karen C Dannemiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resistome in the indoor dust samples from workplaces and households: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas NastasiEnvironmental Science Graduate Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Sarah R HainesDepartment of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ashleigh BopeEnvironmental Science Graduate Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Marit E MeyerNASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135, USA.
John M HorackDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and John Glenn College of Public Affairs, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Karen C DannemillerDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, College of Engineering, Environmental Health Sciences, The Ohio State University, 470 Hitchcock Hall, 2050 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Dannemiller.70@osu.edu.

Funding

NASA Space Biology Grant #80NSSC19K0429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human occupied built environments are no longer confined to Earth. In fact, there have been humans living and working in low-Earth orbit on the International Space Station (ISS) since November 2000. With NASA's Artemis missions and the age of commercial space stations set to begin, more human-occupied spacecraft than ever will be in Earth's orbit and beyond. On Earth and in the ISS, microbes, especially fungi, can be found in dust and grow when unexpected, elevated moisture conditions occur. However, we do not yet know how indoor microbiomes in Earth-based homes and in the ISS differ due to their unique set of environmental conditions. Here we show that bacterial and fungal communities are different in dust collected from vacuum bags on Earth and the ISS, with Earth-based homes being more diverse (465 fungal OTUs and 237 bacterial ASVs) compared to the ISS (102 fungal OTUs and 102 bacterial ASVs). When dust from these locations were exposed to varying equilibrium relative humidity conditions (ERH), there were also significant fungal community composition changes as ERH and time elevated increased (Bray Curtis: R

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorDustFungiMicrobiotaSpacecraftAir MicrobiologyBacteriaBuilt EnvironmentEarth, PlanetHumansHumidityDust

Identifiers

PMID38789478
PMCPMC11126634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.