Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789263›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Computation on Demand: Action-Specific Representations of Visual Task Features Arise during Distinct Movement Phases.

Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, Adrian Nestor, Matthias Niemeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Phase-Dependent Visual and Sensorimotor Integration of Features for Grasp Computations before and after Effector Specification.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina LeeDepartment of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada.
Lin Lawrence GuoDepartment of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2965-8442
Adrian NestorDepartment of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2250-8759
Matthias NiemeierDepartment of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada m.niemeier@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intention to act influences the computations of various task-relevant features. However, little is known about the time course of these computations. Furthermore, it is commonly held that these computations are governed by conjunctive neural representations of the features. But, support for this view comes from paradigms arbitrarily combining task features and affordances, thus requiring representations in working memory. Therefore, the present study used electroencephalography and a well-rehearsed task with features that afford minimal working memory representations to investigate the temporal evolution of feature representations and their potential integration in the brain. Female and male human participants grasped objects or touched them with a knuckle. Objects had different shapes and were made of heavy or light materials with shape and weight being relevant for grasping, not for "knuckling." Using multivariate analysis showed that representations of object shape were similar for grasping and knuckling. However, only for grasping did early shape representations reactivate at later phases of grasp planning, suggesting that sensorimotor control signals feed back to the early visual cortex. Grasp-specific representations of material/weight only arose during grasp execution after object contact during the load phase. A trend for integrated representations of shape and material also became grasp-specific but only briefly during the movement onset. These results suggest that the brain generates action-specific representations of relevant features as required for the different subcomponents of its action computations. Our results argue against the view that goal-directed actions inevitably join all features of a task into a sustained and unified neural representation.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyHand StrengthMovementPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adultaction computationsEEGfeature integrationgraspingmultivariatevisuomotor

Identifiers

PMID38789263
PMCPMC11255428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.