Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789132›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of ophthalmology2024

Two-year outcomes of Xen 45 gel stent implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry.

Louis Arnould, Elise Balsat, Yohei Hashimoto, Andrew White, George Kong, Hamish Dunn, Leo Fan, Pierre-Henry Gabrielle, Alain M Bron, Catherine P Creuzot-Garcher and 1 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting bleb revision after XEN gel stent surgery in a real-world open-angle glaucoma cohort.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Factors influencing the long-term-success of the XEN gel stent.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinal analysis of XEN45 gel stent bleb morphology using bleb grading scales, anterior segment-OCT, in vivo confocal microscopy, and impression cytology.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louis Arnould *Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France louis.arnould@chu-dijon.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7831-8818
Elise Balsat *Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Yohei HashimotoOphthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew WhiteWestmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6931-5797
George KongCentre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hamish DunnOphthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Leo FanOphthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-6189-9218
Pierre-Henry GabrielleOphthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-4845
Alain M BronEye and Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, INRA Centre de Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-931X
Catherine P Creuzot-GarcherEye and Nutrition Research Group, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, INRA Centre de Dijon, Dijon, France.
Mitchell LawlorOphthalmology, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7600-2534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes of the Xen 45 gel stent implant over 24 months of follow-up.

methodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness observational registry. Complete success (CS) was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≥20% from preoperative and an IOP ≤18 mm Hg and ≥6 mm Hg with no secondary procedure at 2 years and without IOP-lowering medications. Qualified success (QS) was defined similarly, allowing the use of IOP-lowering medications.

resultsThe Xen 45 gel stent implant was implanted in 646 eyes of 515 patients. Preoperative IOP was 21.4±7.6 (mean±SD) mm Hg on 2.7±1.3 IOP-lowering medication and mean deviation was -10.2±8.4 dB. After 24-month follow-up, IOP was 16.8±7.3 mm Hg (mean reduction of 21.7%) on 1.2±1.4 IOP-lowering medications. CS and QS rates at 24 months were 26% and 48%, respectively. CS and QS were higher in the Xen stand-alone group (33% and 52%, respectively) than in the Xen+cataract group (16% and 42%, respectively). Bleb needling was performed in 28.4% of cases, and 18% underwent a secondary procedure.

conclusionsThe Xen 45 gel stent implant offers acceptable long-term efficacy for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. However, there is a significant rate of reoperation and needling, and outcomes are less effective if combined with cataract surgery.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureRegistriesStentsVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overBlindnessFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignProsthesis ImplantationGlaucomaOptic NerveTreatment Surgery

Identifiers

PMID38789132
PMCPMC11671995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.