Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38789083›Full record

ArticleJournal of global antimicrobial resistance2024

A scoping review of bacterial resistance among inpatients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Noora Reffat, Rebecca J Schwei, Meggie Griffin, Aurora Pop-Vicas, Lucas T Schulz, Michael S Pulia

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiological and Antimicrobial Resistance Trends ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noora ReffatSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Rebecca J SchweiBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Meggie GriffinBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Aurora Pop-VicasDepartment of Medicine-Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Lucas T SchulzSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael S PuliaBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: mspulia@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

Characterizing the ImPact of COVID-19 on Antibiotic PreScribing in AcutE Care and IDentifying Resilient Stewardship Strategies (POISED)R01HS028669 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PULIA, MICHAEL SANTINO · 2021 to 2024
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS028669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention operations worldwide, raising concerns for an acceleration of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Therefore, we aimed to define the scope of peer reviewed research comparing AMR in inpatient bacterial clinical cultures before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review and searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through 15 June 2023. Our inclusion criteria were: (1) English language, (2) primary evidence, (3) peer-reviewed, (4) clinical culture data from humans, (5) AMR data for at least one bacterial order/species, (6) inpatient setting, (7) use of statistical testing to evaluate AMR data before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reviewers extracted country, study design, type of analysis, study period, setting and population, number of positive cultures or isolates, culture type(s), method of AMR analysis, organisms, and AMR results. Study results were organised by organism and antibiotic class or resistance mechanism. AMR results are also summarised by individual study and across all studies.

resultsIn total, 4805 articles were identified with 55 papers meeting inclusion criteria. Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly studied organisms. There were 464 bacterial AMR results across all studies with 82 (18%) increase, 71 (15%) decrease, and 311 (67%) no change results.

conclusionsThe literature examining the impact of COVID-19 on AMR among inpatients is diverse with most results reflecting no change pre/post pandemic. Ongoing inquiry is needed into evolving patterns in AMR post COVID-19.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCOVID-19Drug Resistance, BacterialInpatientsSARS-CoV-2Antimicrobial StewardshipBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansPandemicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceAntimicrobial resistanceCovid-19

Identifiers

PMID38789083
PMCPMC11392638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.