Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38788772›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2024

Leveraging Novel Clinical Decision Support to Improve Preferred Language Documentation in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Osvaldo Mercado, Alex Ruan, Bolu Oluwalade, Matthew Devine, Kathleen Gibbs, Leah Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Osvaldo MercadoDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Alex RuanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Bolu OluwaladeDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Matthew DevineDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Kathleen GibbsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Leah CarrDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognition of the patient and family's diverse backgrounds and language preference is critical for communicating effectively. In our hospital's electronic health record, a patient or family's identified language for communication is documented in a discrete field known as "preferred language." This field serves as an interdepartmental method to identify patients with a non-English preferred language, creating a bolded banner for non-English speakers easily identifiable by health care professionals. Despite the importance of documenting preferred language to facilitate equitable care, this field is often blank.

objectivesUsing the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, our team sought to increase preferred language documentation within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from a baseline of 74% in September 2021 to above 90% within 6 months.

methodsA multidisciplinary team was assembled to address preferred language documentation. Our team incorporated guidance regarding preferred language documentation into a novel clinical decision support (CDS) tool aimed at addressing various safety and quality measures within the NICU. Our primary outcome metric was documentation of family's preferred language. Process measures included overall compliance with the CDS tool. A secondary outcome was the assessment of preferred language documentation accuracy.

resultsThe average rate of preferred language documentation increased from a baseline of 74 to 92% within 6 months and is currently sustained at 96%. Moreover, our follow-up assessments found that 100% of a random sample of contacted patients (

conclusionUsing a quality improvement framework coupled with a CDS initiative, our team was able to successfully and accurately improve preferred language documentation in our NICU. Future projects include strategies for more equitable care for patients with non-English preferences such as improved interpreter usage and discharge instructions in their preferred language.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDocumentationIntensive Care Units, NeonatalElectronic Health RecordsHumansInfant, NewbornLanguage

Identifiers

PMID38788772
PMCPMC11290947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.