ArticleSeminars in arthritis and rheumatism2024
Personalizing cardiovascular risk prediction for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risks in Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- IL-6 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: At the Intersection of Disease Activity and Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Controlling cardiovascular risk factors reduces progression of atherosclerosis in a multiethnic cohort of patients with lupus.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive analysis of predictive models for disease manifestations and case fatality in systemic lupus erythematosus.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- A narrative review of sex-related differences in inflammatory bowel disease-associated cardiovascular and thrombotic risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention strategies.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular risk stratification in inflammatory-driven conditions: how far have we come?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Psoriatic Arthritis Features and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Association Between Cardiovascular Risk and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Korean Female Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Risk Predictors for Abnormal Left Ventricular and Atrial Function in Lupus Erythematosus.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025Article
- A novel approach to cardiovascular events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: risk factor assessment and treatment analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Statin Use in Special Populations for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Modern therapy of patients with lupus erythematosus must include appropriate management of their heightened rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: a literature update.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Review
- Ten tips in lupus nephritis management.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: from preclinical lupus to atherosclerotic plaque erosion.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
- Effect of Spermidine on Endothelial Function in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Prevalence of cardiovascular events in a population-based registry of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Deciphering Mechanisms, Prevention Strategies, Management Plans, Medications, and Research Techniques for Strokes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Cardiometabolic Risk, Evaluation, and Control in Lupus Nephritis.Glomerular diseasesArticle
- 'Information is power': A qualitative exploration of co-producing education resources about cardiovascular disease in partnership with women living with lupus.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is increased in SLE and underestimated by general population prediction algorithms. We aimed to develop a novel SLE-specific prediction tool, SLECRISK, to provide a more accurate estimate of CVD risk in SLE.
methodsWe studied patients in the Brigham and Women's Hospital SLE cohort. We collected one-year baseline data including the presence of traditional CVD factors and SLE-related features at cohort enrollment. Ten-year follow-up for the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiac death) began at day +1 following the baseline period (index date). ICD-9/10 codes identified MACE were adjudicated by board-certified cardiologists. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression selected SLE-related variables to add to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk Equations 10-year risk Cox regression model. Model fit statistics and performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, c-statistic) for predicting moderate/high 10-year risk (≥7.5 %) of MACE were assessed and compared to ACC/AHA, Framingham risk score (FRS), and modified FRS (mFRS). Optimism adjustment internal validation was performed using bootstrapping.
resultsWe included 1,243 patients with 90 MACEs (46 MIs, 36 strokes, 19 cardiac deaths) over 8946.5 person-years of follow-up. SLE variables selected for the new prediction algorithm (SLECRISK) were SLE activity (remission/mild vs. moderate/severe), disease duration (years), creatinine (mg/dL), anti-dsDNA, anti-RNP, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Ro positivity, and low C4. The sensitivity for detecting moderate/high-risk (≥7.5 %) of MACE using SLECRISK was 0.74 (95 %CI: 0.65, 0.83), which was better than the sensitivity of the ACC/AHA model (0.38 (95 %CI: 0.28, 0.48)). It also identified 3.4-fold more moderate/high-risk patients than the ACC/AHA. Patients who were moderate/high-risk according to SLECRISK but not ACC/AHA, were more likely to be young women with severe SLE and few other traditional CVD risk factors. Model performance between SLECRISK, FRS, and mFRS were similar.
conclusionThe novel SLECRISK tool is more sensitive than the ACC/AHA for predicting moderate/high 10-year risk for MACE and may be particularly useful in predicting risk for young females with severe SLE. Future external validation studies utilizing cohorts with more severe SLE are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.