Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38788271›Full record

ArticleNursing outlook

Burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention among primary care nurse practitioners with their own patient panels.

Do Kyung Kim, Paul Scott, Lusine Poghosyan, Grant R Martsolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing outlook. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Do Kyung KimSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: dok46@pitt.edu.
Paul ScottSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lusine PoghosyanSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Grant R MartsolfSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Chronic Disease Outcomes and Nurse Practitioner PracticeR01MD011514 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI POGHOSYAN, LUSINE · 2017 to 2020
$3.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurse practitioners (NPs) can enhance NP care and improve access to care by autonomously managing their patient panels. Yet, its impact on workforce outcomes such as burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intention remains unexplored. PURPOSE: To estimate the impact of NP panel management on workforce outcomes.

methodsStructural equation modeling was conducted using survey data from 1,244 primary care NPs. NP panel management was categorized into co-managing patients with other providers, both co-managing and autonomously managing, and fully autonomous management. DISCUSSION: Fully autonomous management led to more burnout than co-managing (B = 0.089, bias-corrected 95% bootstrap confidence interval [0.028, 0.151]). Work hours partially (27%) mediated this relationship. This findings indicate that greater autonomy in panel management among NPs may lead to increased burnout, partially due to longer work hours.

conclusionInterventions to reduce work hours could help NPs deliver quality care without burnout.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalJob SatisfactionNurse PractitionersPersonnel TurnoverPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAutonomyNurse practitionerPanel managementPrimary careWorkforce outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38788271
PMCPMC11330733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.