Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38788212›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

Leigha Comer, Lorie Donelle, Bradley Hiebert, Maxwell J Smith, Anita Kothari, Saverio Stranges, Jason Gilliland, Jed Long, Jacquelyn Burkell, Jacob J Shelley and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Leigha Comer *Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-8685
Lorie Donelle *Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9276-8639
Bradley Hiebert *Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0361-7156
Maxwell J Smith *School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5230-0548
Anita Kothari *School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1533-6976
Saverio Stranges *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5226-8373
Jason Gilliland *Department of Geography and Environment, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-2178
Jed Long *Department of Geography and Environment, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-3085
Jacquelyn Burkell *Faculty of Information and Media Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-8127
Jacob J Shelley *Western Law, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2432-9874
Jodi Hall *Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-5530
James Shelley *Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8288-7300
Tommy Cooke *Surveillance Studies Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9353-4279
Marionette Ngole Dione *Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7978-587X
Danica Facca *Faculty of Information and Media Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3150-4805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the deployment of digital technologies for public health surveillance globally. The rapid development and use of these technologies have curtailed opportunities to fully consider their potential impacts (eg, for human rights, civil liberties, privacy, and marginalization of vulnerable groups).

objectiveWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed and gray literature to identify the types and applications of digital technologies used for surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the predicted and witnessed consequences of digital surveillance.

methodsOur methodology was informed by the 5-stage methodological framework to guide scoping reviews: identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; study selection; charting the data; and collating, summarizing, and reporting the findings. We conducted a search of peer-reviewed and gray literature published between December 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. We focused on the first year of the pandemic to provide a snapshot of the questions, concerns, findings, and discussions emerging from peer-reviewed and gray literature during this pivotal first year of the pandemic. Our review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guidelines.

resultsWe reviewed a total of 147 peer-reviewed and 79 gray literature publications. Based on our analysis of these publications, we identified a total of 90 countries and regions where digital technologies were used for public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of the most frequently used technologies included mobile phone apps, location-tracking technologies, drones, temperature-scanning technologies, and wearable devices. We also found that the literature raised concerns regarding the implications of digital surveillance in relation to data security and privacy, function creep and mission creep, private sector involvement in surveillance, human rights, civil liberties, and impacts on marginalized groups. Finally, we identified recommendations for ethical digital technology design and use, including proportionality, transparency, purpose limitation, protecting privacy and security, and accountability.

conclusionsA wide range of digital technologies was used worldwide to support public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of our analysis highlight the importance of considering short- and long-term consequences of digital surveillance not only during the COVID-19 pandemic but also for future public health crises. These findings also demonstrate the ways in which digital surveillance has rendered visible the shifting and blurred boundaries between public health surveillance and other forms of surveillance, particularly given the ubiquitous nature of digital surveillance. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053962.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital TechnologyPandemicsHumansPublic Health SurveillanceCOVID-19digital surveillancedigital technologiespandemicpublic healthscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38788212
PMCPMC11129783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.