Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38788065›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

Epistatic Features and Machine Learning Improve Alzheimer's Disease Risk Prediction Over Polygenic Risk Scores.

Stephen Hermes, Janet Cady, Steven Armentrout, James O'Connor, Sarah Carlson Holdaway, Carlos Cruchaga, Thomas Wingo, Ellen McRae Greytak, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen HermesParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
Janet CadyParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
Steven ArmentroutParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
James O'ConnorParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
Sarah Carlson HoldawayParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
Carlos CruchagaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas WingoGoizueta Alzheimer's Disease Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ellen McRae GreytakParabon NanoLabs, Inc., Reston, VA, USA.
the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne Elizabeth Schindler · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
Alzheimer's Disease Genetics ConsortiumU01AG032984 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHELLENBERG, GERARD DAVID · 2009 to 2024
$60.4M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gil Dan Rabinovici · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Teresa Gomez-Isla · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
The Emory Healthy Brain Study: Discovering Predictive Biomarkers for Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG070937 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAH, JAMES J · 2021 to 2025
$35.2M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Mark W Bondi · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Barbara Brigitta Bendlin · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Carolyn Wei Zhu · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92019D00031NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065226NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL102419NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068024NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068077NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068082NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066506NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008122NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033193NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044546NIA NIH HHS R01 AG070937NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079280NIA NIH HHS R44 AG050366NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG053303NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG058501NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG074007NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032984NIA NIH HHS U01 AG058922NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS017950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are linear combinations of genetic markers weighted by effect size that are commonly used to predict disease risk. For complex heritable diseases such as late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD), PRS models fail to capture much of the heritability. Additionally, PRS models are highly dependent on the population structure of the data on which effect sizes are assessed and have poor generalizability to new data. Objective: The goal of this study is to construct a paragenic risk score that, in addition to single genetic marker data used in PRS, incorporates epistatic interaction features and machine learning methods to predict risk for LOAD. Methods: We construct a new state-of-the-art genetic model for risk of Alzheimer's disease. Our approach innovates over PRS models in two ways: First, by directly incorporating epistatic interactions between SNP loci using an evolutionary algorithm guided by shared pathway information; and second, by estimating risk via an ensemble of non-linear machine learning models rather than a single linear model. We compare the paragenic model to several PRS models from the literature trained on the same dataset. Results: The paragenic model is significantly more accurate than the PRS models under 10-fold cross-validation, obtaining an AUC of 83% and near-clinically significant matched sensitivity/specificity of 75%. It remains significantly more accurate when evaluated on an independent holdout dataset and maintains accuracy within APOE genotype strata. Conclusions: Paragenic models show potential for improving disease risk prediction for complex heritable diseases such as LOAD over PRS models.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseEpistasis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMachine LearningMultifactorial InheritanceAgedApolipoproteins EFemaleGenetic Risk ScoreGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideApolipoproteins EAlzheimer’s diseasedata miningdeep learningepistasismachine learningpredictive genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID38788065
PMCPMC11284654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.