ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024
Electric Field-Modulated Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Quantity Calibration and Mass Tracking.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Acceleration Field and Inlet Temperature on Ion Yields of Small Molecules in Atmospheric Pressure MALDI.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Bioanalytical Methods for Quantification and Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.The AAPS journal · 2025Review
- Shaping electrospray plume with convergent sound beams.iScience · 2025Article
- Does the Formation of a Taylor Cone in a Pulsating Electrospray Directly Impact Mass Spectrometry Signals?ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyses conducted by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) typically entail performing a number of preparatory steps, which include quantity calibration and mass calibration. Quantity calibration can be affected by signal noise, while mass calibration can be affected by instrumental drift if analyses are performed over an extended period of time. Here, we present two methods for achieving these calibrations using modulation of electrospray plume by alternating electric fields and demodulating the resulting MS ion currents. For this purpose, we use an ESI source fitted with three ring electrodes between the electrospray emitter and the mass spectrometer's inlet. One of these electrodes is supplied with a sine electric signal. Optionally, a nanoESI emitter is also placed between the ring electrodes and the mass spectrometer's orifice to supply calibrant ions. The ion currents, recorded with this setup, present wave-like features. In the first variant, using a triple quadrupole mass analyzer, the ion currents are subjected to data treatment by fast Fourier transform (FFT), and the resulting FFT magnitudes are correlated with analyte concentrations to produce a calibration plot. In the second variant, using a quadrupole time-of-flight mass analyzer, the mass spectra recorded at the analyte ion current maxima are mass-checked using the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.