Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787919›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

The distribution of fitness effects during adaptive walks using a simple genetic network.

Nicholas L V O'Brien, Barbara Holland, Jan Engelstädter, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bioengineering hybrid artificial life.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicholas L V O'BrienSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1363-5841
Barbara HollandSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Jan EngelstädterSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel Ortiz-BarrientosSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-416X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tempo and mode of adaptation depends on the availability of beneficial alleles. Genetic interactions arising from gene networks can restrict this availability. However, the extent to which networks affect adaptation remains largely unknown. Current models of evolution consider additive genotype-phenotype relationships while often ignoring the contribution of gene interactions to phenotypic variance. In this study, we model a quantitative trait as the product of a simple gene regulatory network, the negative autoregulation motif. Using forward-time genetic simulations, we measure adaptive walks towards a phenotypic optimum in both additive and network models. A key expectation from adaptive walk theory is that the distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations is exponential. We found that both models instead harbored distributions with fewer large-effect beneficial alleles than expected. The network model also had a complex and bimodal distribution of fitness effects among all mutations, with a considerable density at deleterious selection coefficients. This behavior is reminiscent of the cost of complexity, where correlations among traits constrain adaptation. Our results suggest that the interactions emerging from genetic networks can generate complex and multimodal distributions of fitness effects.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenetic FitnessModels, GeneticMutationSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAllelesComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID38787919
PMCPMC11156440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.