Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787867›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Eligibility for omecamtiv mecarbil in a real-world heart failure population: Data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry.

Felix Lindberg, Natanael Øigaard, Marco Metra, Giuseppe M C Rosano, Ulf Dahlström, Peter Mol, Camilla Hage, Lars H Lund, Gianluigi Savarese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felix LindbergDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Natanael ØigaardDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marco MetraCardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Cardiothoracic Department, Civil Hospitals, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Giuseppe M C RosanoCardiovascular Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Research Institute, St George's University Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ulf DahlströmDepartment of Cardiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Peter MolDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Camilla HageDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars H LundDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gianluigi SavareseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7732-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe assessed eligibility for omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) in a real-world cohort with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) according to the selection criteria of the GALACTIC-HF trial (trial scenario) and selected trial´s criteria more likely to impact real-world use (pragmatic scenario). METHODS AND

resultsWe included 31,015 patients with HFrEF lasting ≥3 months and registered in the Swedish HF registry between 2000-2021. Trial eligibility was calculated by applying all the GALACTIC-HF selection criteria. The pragmatic scenario considered only the New York Heart Association class, history of worsening HF, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP), blood pressure and renal failure criteria defined as in the trial. Eligibility for OM in chronic HFrEF was 21% and 36% in the trial and pragmatic scenarios, respectively. Eligibility was higher in those with EF<30% (trial: 27%, pragmatic: 44%), in-patients (trial:30%, pragmatic:57%), severe HF (trial: 35%, pragmatic: 60%), NYHA class III-IV (trial: 26%, pragmatic: 45%), and NT-proBNP≥5,000pg/mL (trial: 30%, pragmatic: 51%). The criteria that most limited eligibility were history of a recent worsening HF event (60% eligible in chronic HFrEF), elevated NT-proBNP (82% eligible), and deviating blood pressure (82% eligible). Overall, eligible patients were characterized by more severe HF and higher CV event-rates in both scenarios, and higher comorbidity burden in the pragmatic scenario.

conclusionApproximately 21% of real-world chronic HFrEF patients would be eligible for OM according to the GALACTIC-HF selection criteria, and 36% according to the criteria more likely to affect OM use in clinical practice. Criteria in both scenarios identified a patient-group with severe HF and high CV event-rates.

Indexed as

Heart FailureRegistriesStroke VolumeAgedAged, 80 and overEligibility DeterminationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPatient SelectionPeptide FragmentsSwedenUreaNatriuretic Peptide, Brainomecamtiv mecarbilPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Urea

Identifiers

PMID38787867
PMCPMC11125482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.