ArticlePloS one2024
NMY-2, TOE-2 and PIG-1 regulate Caenorhabditis elegans asymmetric cell divisions.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asymmetric cell division is an important mechanism that generates cellular diversity during development. Not only do asymmetric cell divisions produce daughter cells of different fates, but many can also produce daughters of different sizes, which we refer to as Daughter Cell Size Asymmetry (DCSA). In Caenorhabditis elegans, apoptotic cells are frequently produced by asymmetric divisions that exhibit DCSA, where the smaller daughter dies. We focus here on the divisions of the Q.a and Q.p neuroblasts, which produce larger surviving cells and smaller apoptotic cells and divide with opposite polarity using both distinct and overlapping mechanisms. Several proteins regulate DCSA in these divisions. Previous studies showed that the PIG-1/MELK and TOE-2 proteins regulate DCSA in both the Q.a and Q.p divisions, and the non-muscle myosin NMY-2 regulates DCSA in the Q.a division but not the Q.p division. In this study, we examined endogenously tagged NMY-2, TOE-2, and PIG-1 reporters and characterized their distribution at the cortex during the Q.a and Q.p divisions. In both divisions, TOE-2 localized toward the side of the dividing cell that produced the smaller daughter, whereas PIG-1 localized toward the side that produced the larger daughter. As previously reported, NMY-2 localized to the side of Q.a that produced the smaller daughter and did not localize asymmetrically in Q.p. We used temperature-sensitive nmy-2 mutants to determine the role of nmy-2 in these divisions and were surprised to find that these mutants only displayed DCSA defects in the Q.p division. We generated double mutant combinations between the nmy-2 mutations and mutations in toe-2 and pig-1. Because previous studies indicate that DCSA defects result in the transformation of cells fated to die into their sister cells, the finding that the nmy-2 mutations did not significantly alter the Q.a and Q.p DCSA defects of toe-2 and pig-1 mutants but did alter the number of daughter cells produced by Q.a and Q.p suggests that nmy-2 plays a role in specifying the fates of the Q.a and Q.p that is independent of its role in DCSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.