ArticlePloS one2024
Retracted: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity in the allocation of professional public health human resources and its improvement path in China.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Correction: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance.PloS one · 2025Article
- Retraction: Navigating board dynamics: Configuration analysis of corporate governance's factors and their impact on bank performance.PloS one · 2025Article
- Does corporate governance mechanism deter earnings management and enhance readability of annual reports?PloS one · 2025Article
- The composite governance mechanisms and sustainable economic performance of Pakistan's textile industry.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Correction · 2025-02-19Error in Text · Updated to Retraction ·
- Retraction · 2025-10-23Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Objections by Author(s) · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Erratum issued
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research utilizes the fsQCA technique to investigate how a combination of corporate governance conditions or factors collectively influences the performance of banks. Examining key elements such as board size, busy directors, independent directors, CEO duality, and women on the board, the research employs data collected from the annual reports of 30 banks spanning from 2010 to 2020. The necessary condition analysis (NCA) underscores that no individual condition or factor is indispensable for the ultimate outcome. Nevertheless, the sufficiency analysis reveals distinct solutions, each representing a unique set of conditions or factors sufficient to generate the outcome. The study concludes that the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and bank performance is complex and multifaceted, with neither ROA nor ROE reliant on a singular input condition or factor. The theoretical contributions of the findings align with or partially support various theories and propositions within the realm of corporate governance. Notably, the application of fsQCA contributes to enhance the methodological understanding of corporate governance studies in existing literature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.