Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Assessing genotypes of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) as an alternative to maize silage for sheep nutrition.

Sultan Singh, Pushpendra Koli, Tejveer Singh, Madan Mohan Das, Subhendu Bikash Maity, Krishna Kunwar Singh, Rohit Katiyar, Asim Kumar Misra, Sanat Kumar Mahanta, Manoj Kumar Srivastava and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sultan SinghICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Pushpendra KoliICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8352-3856
Tejveer SinghICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Madan Mohan DasICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Subhendu Bikash MaityICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Krishna Kunwar SinghICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Rohit KatiyarICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Asim Kumar MisraICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Sanat Kumar MahantaICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Manoj Kumar SrivastavaICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, UP, India.
Uchenna Young AneleNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, United States of America.
Olatunde Akeem OderinwaleNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-9158
YongLin RenCollege of Environmental and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritive value of five Cenchrus ciliaris (buffel grass) genotypes (IG96-50, IG96-96, IG96-358, IG96-401 and IG96-403) weredetermined. Their sugar contents (>70 mg/g of dry matter) and ensiling potential were evaluated using in vitro batch culture and in vivo studies. Research indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) in the dry matter, organic matter, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, cellulose and lignin contents of the C. ciliaris genotypes tested. Genotypes also differed (P < 0.05) in total carbohydrates, structural carbohydrates, non-structural carbohydrates and protein fractions. Genotype IG96-96 had the lowest total digestible nutrients, digestible energy and metabolizable energy contents (377.2 g/kg, 6.95 and 5.71 MJ/kg of dry matter, respectively), and net energy values for lactation, maintenance and growth. After 45 days of ensiling, C. ciliaris silages differed (P < 0.05) in dry matter, pH, and lactic acid contents, and their values ranged between 255-339, 4.06-5.17 g/kg of dry matter and 10.8-28.0 g/kg of dry matter, respectively. Maize silage had higher (P < 0.05) Organic Matter (919.5g/kg of dry matter), ether extract (20.4g/kg of dry matter) and hemi-cellulose (272.3 g/kg of dry matter) than IG96-401 and IG96-96 silages. The total carbohydrates and non-structural carbohydrates of maize silage were higher (P < 0.05), while structural carbohydrates were comparable (P < 0.05) with C. ciliaris silages. Sheep on maize silage had (P < 0.05) higher metabolizable energy, lower crude protein, and digestible crude protein intake (g/kg of dry matter) than those on C. ciliaris silage diets. Nitrogen intake and urinary-N excretion were higher (P < 0.05) on genotype IG96-96 silage diet. Overall, this study suggested that certain C. ciliaris genotypes, notably IG96-401 and IG96-96, exhibited nutritive values comparable to maize silage in sheep studies, offering a promising avenue for future exploration as potential alternatives in diversified and sustainable livestock nutrition programs.

Indexed as

CenchrusGenotypeNutritive ValueSilageZea maysAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDigestionFemaleSheep

Identifiers

PMID38787825
PMCPMC11125467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.