ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Uncertainty-Aware First-Principles Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty Quantification forChemical reviews · 2026Review
- Lifelong Machine Learning Potentials for Chemical Reaction Network Explorations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Automated Microsolvation for Minimum Energy Path Construction in Solution.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Heron: Visualizing and Controlling Chemical Reaction Explorations and Networks.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
- A human-machine interface for automatic exploration of chemical reaction networks.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploring large chemical reaction networks with automated exploration approaches and accurate quantum chemical methods can require prohibitively large computational resources. Here, we present an automated exploration approach that focuses on the kinetically relevant part of the reaction network by interweaving (i) large-scale exploration of chemical reactions, (ii) identification of kinetically relevant parts of the reaction network through microkinetic modeling, (iii) quantification and propagation of uncertainties, and (iv) reaction network refinement. Such an uncertainty-aware exploration of kinetically relevant parts of a reaction network with automated accuracy improvement has not been demonstrated before in a fully quantum mechanical approach. Uncertainties are identified by local or global sensitivity analysis. The network is refined in a rolling fashion during the exploration. Moreover, the uncertainties are considered during kinetically steering of a rolling reaction network exploration. We demonstrate our approach for Eschenmoser-Claisen rearrangement reactions. The sensitivity analysis identifies that only a small number of reactions and compounds are essential for describing the kinetics reliably, resulting in efficient explorations without sacrificing accuracy and without requiring prior knowledge about the chemistry unfolding.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.