ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Improving Understanding of Visual Snow by Quantifying its Appearance and Effect on Vision.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- External Dynamic Visual Noise Matched to the Appearance of Visual Snow Fails to Reproduce Key Perceptual Properties of the Phenomenon.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Visual Snow Is Susceptible to the Motion Aftereffect.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Exploring the Phenotype and Possible Mechanisms of Palinopsia in Visual Snow Syndrome.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- What does visual snow look like? Quantification by matching a simulation.Journal of vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Visual snow is the hallmark of the neurological condition visual snow syndrome (VSS) but the characteristics of the visual snow percept remain poorly defined. This study aimed to quantify its appearance, interobserver variability, and effect on measured visual performance and self-reported visual quality. Methods: Twenty-three participants with VSS estimated their visual snow dot size, separation, luminance, and flicker rate by matching to a simulation. To assess whether visual snow masks vision, we compared pattern discrimination thresholds for textures that were similar in spatial scale to visual snow as well as more coarse than visual snow, in participants with VSS, and with and without external noise simulating visual snow in 23 controls. Results: Mean and 95% confidence intervals for visual snow appearance were: size (6.0, 5.8-6.3 arcseconds), separation (2.0, 1.7-2.3 arcmin), luminance (72.4, 58.1-86.8 cd/m2), and flicker rate (25.8, 18.9-32.8 frames per image at 120 hertz [Hz]). Participants with finer dot spacing estimates also reported greater visibility of their visual snow (τb = -0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.62 to -0.13, P = 0.01). In controls, adding simulated fine-scale visual snow to textures increased thresholds for fine but not coarse textures (F(1, 22) = 4.98, P = 0.036, ηp2 = 0.19). In VSS, thresholds for fine and coarse textures were similar (t(22) = 0.54, P = 0.60), suggesting that inherent visual snow does not act like external noise in controls. Conclusions: Our quantitative estimates of visual snow constrain its likely neural origins, may aid differential diagnosis, and inform future investigations of how it affects vision. Methods to quantify visual snow are needed for evaluation of potential treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.