Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787488›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2024

Morphological and molecular characterization of two species of genus Ageratum.

Anita Kumari, Malkiat Chand Sidhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anita KumariDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India. anuck494@gmail.com.
Malkiat Chand SidhuDepartment of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 160014, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe species of genus Ageratum (family Asteraceae) are distributed in various parts of the world. Ageratum conyzoides and A. houstonianum are the most commonly occurring species in India. These species are quite similar in their morphology thus creating a challenge in identification during the field survey and taxonomic validation. The accurate identification of the species is highly significant especially when those are of medicinal interest. To overcome the barriers in morphological based identification, DNA barcoding has been employed during the present investigation. METHODS AND

resultsMorphological and DNA barcodes matK and ITS genes, were employed to differentiate between Ageratum conyzoides and A. houstonianum. The obtained matK and ITS gene sequences were submitted to GenBank and BOLD system to obtain accession numbers. The DNA sequences were aligned with database sequences using BLAST and phylogenetic trees were constructed through neighbor-joining algorithm in MEGA 11 software. The distinguish features of A. conyzoides include ovate to elliptic-oblong leaves with a cuneate base and inflorescence heads forming domed to flat-topped clusters. However, A. houstonianum has triangular to ovate leaves with a cordate to truncate base, cymose clusters in the inflorescence and stipulate glandular involucre bracts. The matK gene has shown the highest identity percentages (100%) for A. houstonianum and 99.87% for A. conyzoides. The phylogenetic tree analysis has demonstrated a close association of A. conyzoides and A. houstonianum with their respective species, supported by bootstrap values in the matK and ITS trees.

conclusionThis study revealed that morphological and molecular data can be successfully utilized in the identification of A. conyzoides and A. houstonianum. The matK and ITS barcodes provide promising results in the identification of Ageratum species, with their phylogeny supporting classification within the family asteraceae.

Indexed as

AgeratumDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicPhylogenyDNA, PlantIndiaPlant LeavesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, PlantAngiospermsAsteraceaeBLASTHerbsITSmatKPhylogeneticsTaxonomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.