SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2024
Ultrasound features of high-risk basal cell carcinoma: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High frequency ultrasound for pyoderma gangrenosum: A case series.JAAD case reports · 2025Article
- Impact of histological and clinical parameters on resection status and recurrence probability in head and neck basal cell carcinomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound in Skin Cancer: Why, How, and When to Use It?Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent skin cancer and continues to witness a surge in incidence rates. The categorization of BCC subtypes into low or high risk, guided by recurrence and invasiveness metrics, underscores the need for precise differentiation. While the punch biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, its invasiveness prompts a need for non-invasive alternatives. Ultrasound (US) has emerged as a noteworthy candidate, gaining momentum in its potential to offer a less intrusive diagnostic approach. We conducted a systematic review regarding features of the high-risk subtypes of BCC on US. A thorough literature search of PubMed Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and a total of nine studies meeting our inclusion criteria were included in this review. Evidence is still nascent but US features such as lesional shape, depth, hyperechoic spots, and color doppler may be helpful in differentiating high-risk BCC subtypes. However, further prospective studies with standardized interventions and outcome measures are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38787399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.