Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787305›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2024

Long-term effects of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a phase III trial.

Sang Kun Lee, Sang Ahm Lee, Seung Bong Hong, Yong Won Cho, Guillermo Castilla-Fernández, Miguel M Fonseca, Joana Moreira, Helena Gama, Joerg Holenz

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sang Kun LeeSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-0699
Sang Ahm LeeDepartment of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-0545
Seung Bong HongSamsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine and Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1684-637X
Yong Won ChoKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6127-1045
Guillermo Castilla-FernándezBIAL R&D Investments, S.A, Porto, Portugal.
Miguel M FonsecaBIAL R&D Investments, S.A, Porto, Portugal.
Joana MoreiraBIAL - Portela & Cª, S.A, Coronado, Portugal.
Helena GamaBIAL - Portela & Cª, S.A, Coronado, Portugal.
Joerg HolenzBIAL - Portela & Cª, S.A, Coronado, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A post hoc analysis of data from Asian patients included in the study BIA-2093-304 was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures. Part I was a randomized controlled trial, in which patients received ESL (800 or 1200 mg once daily [QD]) or placebo, assessed over a 12-week maintenance period. Patients completing Part I could enter two open-label extension periods (Part II, 1 year; Part III, ≥2 years), during which all received ESL (400-1600 mg QD). Safety/tolerability was assessed by evaluating treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included responder and seizure freedom rates. The safety population included 125, 92, and 23 Asian patients in Parts I, II, and III, respectively. Incidence of ESL-related TEAEs was 61.3%, 45.7%, and 17.4% during Parts I, II, and III, respectively. ESL-related TEAEs (most commonly, dizziness, somnolence, and headache) were consistent with ESL's known safety profile. During Part I, responder rates were higher with ESL 800 (41.7%) and 1200 mg QD (44.4%) versus placebo (32.6%), although not statistically significant. Seizure freedom rates with ESL 800 (5.5%) and 1200 mg QD (11.1%) were also higher versus placebo (0%) (p < 0.05 for ESL 1200 mg QD versus placebo). At the end of Part II, responder and seizure freedom rates were 60.3% and 14.7%, respectively. In summary, adult Asian patients with refractory focal seizures were responsive to treatment with ESL as adjunctive therapy and generally showed treatment tolerance well for up to 3 years. No new/unexpected safety findings were observed.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsAsian PeopleDibenzazepinesAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistant EpilepsyDrug Therapy, CombinationEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeizuresTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsDibenzazepineseslicarbazepine acetate

Identifiers

PMID38787305
PMCPMC11121758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.