ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Post-Conization HPV Vaccination and Its Impact on Viral Status: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Troms and Finnmark, 2022.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Adjuvant HPV Vaccination into Cervical Dysplasia Management After LLETZ/Conization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Expanding HPV prevention across the life course: evidence on vaccine effectiveness in adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- HPV Vaccination and HPV Outcomes After LEEP: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study from Northern Norway, 2022-2024.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of preoperative and postoperative HPV infection dynamics in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: implications for screening and management.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Influence of Pre-Vaccination HPV Status on Vaccine Effectiveness Among Chinese Women: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Early and long-term effects of prophylactic and post-excision human papillomavirus vaccination on recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia relative to margin status: a retrospective cohort study in the Czech Republic.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- HPV-16-Induced Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: HPV Vaccination May Be Useful.Cancers · 2025Article
- High rate of persistent HPV detection after diagnostic cervical excision in older screen-positive women.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with cellular changes in the cervix leading to cancer, which highlights the importance of vaccination in preventing HPV infections and subsequent cellular changes. Women undergoing the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), a treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), remain at risk of recurrence. This study assessed the effect of post-conization HPV vaccination on the viral status of women at six months post-conization, aiming to evaluate the vaccine's effectiveness in preventing recurrence of CIN2+. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women in Troms and Finnmark who underwent conization in 2022. Using the SymPathy database and the national vaccination register (SYSVAK), we analyzed the vaccination statuses and HPV test results of women born before 1991, who had not received the HPV vaccine prior to conization. Out of 419 women undergoing conization, 243 met the inclusion criteria. A significant association was found between post-conization HPV vaccination and a negative HPV test at six months of follow-up (ARR = 12.1%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.