Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787173›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2024

Comparison of St. Thomas II Cardioplegia and Modified Del Nido Cardioplegia in Dogs Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery.

Yuki Onuma, Tomohiko Yoshida, Katsuhiro Matsuura, Yuki Aboshi, Mizuki Hasegawa, Shusaku Yamada, Youta Yaginuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuki OnumaVCA Japan Shiraishi Animal Hospital, Sayamadai, 4-33-2, Sayama 350-1304, Saitama, Japan.
Tomohiko YoshidaDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Nishi 2-11, Inada, Obihiro 080-8555, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-9311
Katsuhiro MatsuuraDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, 2015 SW 16th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-2865
Yuki AboshiVCA Japan Shiraishi Animal Hospital, Sayamadai, 4-33-2, Sayama 350-1304, Saitama, Japan.
Mizuki HasegawaVCA Japan Shiraishi Animal Hospital, Sayamadai, 4-33-2, Sayama 350-1304, Saitama, Japan.
Shusaku YamadaVCA Japan Shiraishi Animal Hospital, Sayamadai, 4-33-2, Sayama 350-1304, Saitama, Japan.
Youta YaginumaVCA Japan Shiraishi Animal Hospital, Sayamadai, 4-33-2, Sayama 350-1304, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial protection has become an essential adjunctive procedure in veterinary cardiac surgery. Del Nido cardioplegia is a good alternative to the traditional St. Thomas II (ST) cardioplegia in open heart surgery in humans. This study aims to compare intra- and postoperative results between ST cardioplegia and modified del Nido (mDN) cardioplegia in mitral valve surgery in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD). This retrospective study was conducted using clinical records of 16 MMVD dogs that underwent either ST or mDN cardioplegia. We measured cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time, total operation time, the number of cardioplegia doses, total amount of cardioplegia, required defibrillations, in-hospital mortality and pre- and one-month postoperative echocardiographic variables. CPB (159.4 ± 16.1 vs. 210.1 ± 34.0 min), ACC (101.4 ± 7.0 vs. 136.0 ± 24.8 min) and total operation time (262.3 ± 13.1 vs. 327.0 ± 45.4 min) were significantly shorter in the mDN group (

Indexed as

cardioplegic solutionmitral valve surgerymyocardial protection

Identifiers

PMID38787173
PMCPMC11125571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.