Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38787126›Full record

ArticleToxics2024

Applying Red Mud in Cadmium Contamination Remediation: A Scoping Review.

Jintao Li, Xuwei Li, Matthew Fischel, Xiaochen Lin, Shiqi Zhou, Lei Zhang, Lei Wang, Jiali Yan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jintao LiSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China.
Xuwei LiNanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, Nanjing 210042, China.
Matthew FischelSustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5326-1322
Xiaochen LinNanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, Nanjing 210042, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3229-8051
Shiqi ZhouSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China.
Lei ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5282-3023
Lei WangEcological Environment Bureau of Chuzhou City, Chuzhou 239000, China.
Jiali YanSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China.

Funding

the Anhui Provincial Educational Foundation 2023AH051627the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2308085Y27the Chuzhou University Start-up Foundation for Research 2022qd020the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 42107049the Science Research Project in University of Anhui Province for Distinguished Young Scholars 2022AH020070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red mud is an industrial solid waste rarely utilized and often disposed of in landfills, resulting in resource waste and environmental pollution. However, due to its high pH and abundance of iron and aluminum oxides and hydroxides, red mud has excellent adsorption properties which can effectively remove heavy metals through ion exchange, adsorption, and precipitation. Therefore, red mud is a valuable resource rather than a waste byproduct. In recent years, red mud has been increasingly studied for its potential in wastewater treatment and soil improvement. Red mud can effectively reduce the migration and impact of heavy metals in soils and water bodies. This paper reviews the research results from using red mud to mitigate cadmium pollution in water bodies and soils, discusses the environmental risks of red mud, and proposes key research directions for the future management of red mud in cadmium-contaminated environments.

Indexed as

cadmiumcontaminant immobilizationenvironmental remediationheavy metal sorptionred mud

Identifiers

PMID38787126
PMCPMC11125661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.