ReviewJournal of imaging2024
Advances in Real-Time 3D Reconstruction for Medical Endoscopy.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dataset for Depth in Robotic Endoscopy with Dynamic Scenarios (DRENDS).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Progress and Challenges in Joining for Precision Endoscope Fabrication.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A novel system design for monocular laser assisted capsule endoscopy for 3D small bowel modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Navigation Systems in Endoscopic Ultrasound Procedures: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Adaptive Support Weight-Based Stereo Matching with Iterative Disparity Refinement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The RoDEM benchmark: evaluating the robustness of monocular single-shot depth estimation methods in minimally-invasive surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) for 3D Reconstruction of Monocular Endoscopic Video in Sinus Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This contribution is intended to provide researchers with a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art concerning real-time 3D reconstruction methods suitable for medical endoscopy. Over the past decade, there have been various technological advancements in computational power and an increased research effort in many computer vision fields such as autonomous driving, robotics, and unmanned aerial vehicles. Some of these advancements can also be adapted to the field of medical endoscopy while coping with challenges such as featureless surfaces, varying lighting conditions, and deformable structures. To provide a comprehensive overview, a logical division of monocular, binocular, trinocular, and multiocular methods is performed and also active and passive methods are distinguished. Within these categories, we consider both flexible and non-flexible endoscopes to cover the state-of-the-art as fully as possible. The relevant error metrics to compare the publications presented here are discussed, and the choice of when to choose a GPU rather than an FPGA for camera-based 3D reconstruction is debated. We elaborate on the good practice of using datasets and provide a direct comparison of the presented work. It is important to note that in addition to medical publications, publications evaluated on the KITTI and Middlebury datasets are also considered to include related methods that may be suited for medical 3D reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.