Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38786570›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

When Two Eyes Don't Suffice-Learning Difficult Hyperfluorescence Segmentations in Retinal Fundus Autofluorescence Images via Ensemble Learning.

Monty Santarossa, Tebbo Tassilo Beyer, Amelie Bernadette Antonia Scharf, Ayse Tatli, Claus von der Burchard, Jakob Nazarenus, Johann Baptist Roider, Reinhard Koch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monty SantarossaDepartment of Computer Science, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-1367
Tebbo Tassilo BeyerDepartment of Computer Science, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Amelie Bernadette Antonia ScharfDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Ayse TatliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Claus von der BurchardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2163-5905
Jakob NazarenusDepartment of Computer Science, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-2462
Johann Baptist RoiderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Reinhard KochDepartment of Computer Science, Kiel University, 24118 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-1569

Funding

Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action FKZ 01MK20012E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperfluorescence (HF) and reduced autofluorescence (RA) are important biomarkers in fundus autofluorescence images (FAF) for the assessment of health of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), an important indicator of disease progression in geographic atrophy (GA) or central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Autofluorescence images have been annotated by human raters, but distinguishing biomarkers (whether signals are increased or decreased) from the normal background proves challenging, with borders being particularly open to interpretation. Consequently, significant variations emerge among different graders, and even within the same grader during repeated annotations. Tests on in-house FAF data show that even highly skilled medical experts, despite previously discussing and settling on precise annotation guidelines, reach a pair-wise agreement measured in a Dice score of no more than 63-80% for HF segmentations and only 14-52% for RA. The data further show that the agreement of our primary annotation expert with herself is a 72% Dice score for HF and 51% for RA. Given these numbers, the task of automated HF and RA segmentation cannot simply be refined to the improvement in a segmentation score. Instead, we propose the use of a segmentation ensemble. Learning from images with a single annotation, the ensemble reaches expert-like performance with an agreement of a 64-81% Dice score for HF and 21-41% for RA with all our experts. In addition, utilizing the mean predictions of the ensemble networks and their variance, we devise ternary segmentations where FAF image areas are labeled either as confident background, confident HF, or potential HF, ensuring that predictions are reliable where they are confident (97% Precision), while detecting all instances of HF (99% Recall) annotated by all experts.

Indexed as

ambiguousannotationcentral serous chorioretinopathyCSCRdeep learningensemblefundus autofluorescencehyperfluorescenceimage analysisinter-observer variabilityintra-observer variabilityreduced autofluorescenceretinalsegmentationternaryU-Net

Identifiers

PMID38786570
PMCPMC11122615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.