Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38786559›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Comparative Analysis of Color Space and Channel, Detector, and Descriptor for Feature-Based Image Registration.

Wenan Yuan, Sai Raghavendra Prasad Poosa, Rutger Francisco Dirks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenan YuanIndependent Researcher, Oak Brook, IL 60523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6300-2973
Sai Raghavendra Prasad PoosaIndependent Researcher, Oak Brook, IL 60523, USA.
Rutger Francisco DirksIndependent Researcher, Oak Brook, IL 60523, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8830-9007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to quantify the value of color spaces and channels as a potential superior replacement for standard grayscale images, as well as the relative performance of open-source detectors and descriptors for general feature-based image registration purposes, based on a large benchmark dataset. The public dataset UDIS-D, with 1106 diverse image pairs, was selected. In total, 21 color spaces or channels including RGB, XYZ, Y'CrCb, HLS, L*a*b* and their corresponding channels in addition to grayscale, nine feature detectors including AKAZE, BRISK, CSE, FAST, HL, KAZE, ORB, SIFT, and TBMR, and 11 feature descriptors including AKAZE, BB, BRIEF, BRISK, DAISY, FREAK, KAZE, LATCH, ORB, SIFT, and VGG were evaluated according to reprojection error (RE), root mean square error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), registration failure rate, and feature number, based on 1,950,984 image registrations. No meaningful benefits from color space or channel were observed, although XYZ, RGB color space and L* color channel were able to outperform grayscale by a very minor margin. Per the dataset, the best-performing color space or channel, detector, and descriptor were XYZ/RGB, SIFT/FAST, and AKAZE. The most robust color space or channel, detector, and descriptor were L*a*b*, TBMR, and VGG. The color channel, detector, and descriptor with the most initial detector features and final homography features were Z/L*, FAST, and KAZE. In terms of the best overall unfailing combinations, XYZ/RGB+SIFT/FAST+VGG/SIFT seemed to provide the highest image registration quality, while Z+FAST+VGG provided the most image features.

Indexed as

comparisonimage stitchingOpenCVPython

Identifiers

PMID38786559
PMCPMC11122496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.