ArticleDentistry journal2024
A Comparison of Guided Bone Regeneration vs. the Shell Technique Using Xenogeneic Bone Blocks in Horizontal Bone Defects: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Bone Volume in Horizontal Atrophic Ridges Augmentation Using Tenting Grafting Technique Versus Khoury Technique in Mandibular Molar and Premolar Region: Randomized Clinical Trial
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Assessment of Anterior Horizontal Maxillary Bone Augmentation Using Autogenous and Bovine Sticky Bone Versus Autogenous and Bovine Bone Shell Technique (Khoury): A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the effects of menopause on the quality and quantity of intraoral autogenous block graft donor sites using cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- In situ flip osteotomy bone block: an alternative bone graft harvesting site proposal for anterior maxillary bone defects. A case report at 3-year follow-up.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Using a Single-Screw Cortical Disc for a Simplified Shell Technique: A Novel Approach and Technical Note.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cases of severe horizontal atrophy, implant placement requires bone reconstruction procedures. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the outcomes of bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using the shell technique to the outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR) in cases of severely horizontal bone atrophy. This study was designed as a monocentric, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a six-month follow-up. Among the primary outcomes of this study, peri-implant bone regeneration and peri-implant bone defect closure were selected. Forty-four patients were recruited and equally divided between two groups. In the GRB group, a horizontal regeneration of 2.31 ± 0.23 mm was observed opposed to a horizontal regeneration of 2.36 ± 0.17 mm in the shell group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.