Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38786342›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) Expression in Human Tumors: A Comparison with Pan-Cytokeratin and TROP2 in 14,832 Tumors.

Anne Menz, Nora Lony, Maximilian Lennartz, Sebastian Dwertmann Rico, Ria Schlichter, Simon Kind, Viktor Reiswich, Florian Viehweger, David Dum, Andreas M Luebke and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Radiopharmaceutical Tracers in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Anne MenzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Nora LonyInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian LennartzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1572-8200
Sebastian Dwertmann RicoInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Ria SchlichterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Simon KindInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Viktor ReiswichInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Florian ViehwegerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-4313
Andreas M LuebkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-6964
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Natalia GorbokonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7542-4340
Christian BernreutherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-322X
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-4258
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-856X
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea HinschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Frank JacobsenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas H MarxDepartment of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, 90766 Fuerth, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Till KrechInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3652-532X
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EpCAM is expressed in many epithelial tumors and is used for the distinction of malignant mesotheliomas from adenocarcinomas and as a surrogate pan-epithelial marker. A tissue microarray containing 14,832 samples from 120 different tumor categories was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. EpCAM staining was compared with TROP2 and CKpan. EpCAM staining was detectable in 99 tumor categories. Among 78 epithelial tumor types, the EpCAM positivity rate was ≥90% in 60 categories-including adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine neoplasms, and germ cell tumors. EpCAM staining was the lowest in hepatocellular carcinomas, adrenocortical tumors, renal cell neoplasms, and in poorly differentiated carcinomas. A comparison of EpCAM and CKpan staining identified a high concordance but EpCAM was higher in testicular seminomas and neuroendocrine neoplasms and CKpan in hepatocellular carcinomas, mesotheliomas, and poorly differentiated non-neuroendocrine tumors. A comparison of EpCAM and TROP2 revealed a higher rate of TROP2 positivity in squamous cell carcinomas and lower rates in many gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, testicular germ cell tumors, neuroendocrine neoplasms, and renal cell tumors. These data confirm EpCAM as a surrogate epithelial marker for adenocarcinomas and its diagnostic utility for the distinction of malignant mesotheliomas. In comparison to CKpan and TROP2 antibodies, EpCAM staining is particularly common in seminomas and in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Indexed as

CKpanEpCAMimmunohistochemistrytissue microarrayTROP2

Identifiers

PMID38786342
PMCPMC11120328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.