Caudal Regression Syndrome First Diagnosed in Adulthood: A Case Report and a Review of the Literature.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Familial caudal regression syndrome with complex spinal dysraphism presenting as recurrent cutaneous infection.Surgical neurology international · 2026
   Article
2. Two Cases of Singular Sacral S1 Butterfly Vertebra.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Article
3. Sirenomelia and the Spectrum of Caudal Anomalies: Clinical Reflections From a Preterm Termination.Clinical case reports · 2025
   Article
4. Sacral Agenesis Type II in a 12-Year-Old Patient: A Delayed Presentation in a Low-Resource Setting.Cureus · 2025
   Article
5. Positive Evolution of a Child Suffering from Caudal Regression Syndrome and Agenesia Sacra After Treatment with Growth Hormone and Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as