ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of [Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Stomach Preservation Following Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Randomized Phase III SENORITA Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- EUS-FNA improves diagnosis of extraluminal anastomotic recurrence after surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Clinicopathological features and outcome-Real-world experience.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Diagnostics and Therapy for Malignant Tumors.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Device failures and patient adverse events from EUS: 26-year FDA MAUDE analysis (2000-2025).Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
- Long-term prognosis and risk factor-based surveillance strategy for patients with small gastric subepithelial lesion using endoscopic ultrasonography.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to focus on the diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract. In the last decades, EUS has gained a central role in the staging of epithelial and sub-epithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. With the evolution of imaging, the position of EUS in the diagnostic work-up and the staging flow-chart has continuously changed with two extreme positions: some gastroenterologists think that EUS is absolutely indispensable, and some think it is utterly useless. The truth is, as always, somewhere in between the two extremes. Analyzing the most up-to-date and strong evidence, we will try to give EUS the correct position in our daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.