Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38786294›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

IMPA-Net: Interpretable Multi-Part Attention Network for Trustworthy Brain Tumor Classification from MRI.

Yuting Xie, Fulvio Zaccagna, Leonardo Rundo, Claudia Testa, Ruifeng Zhu, Caterina Tonon, Raffaele Lodi, David Neil Manners

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuting XieDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Fulvio ZaccagnaDepartment of Imaging, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SL, UK.
Leonardo RundoDepartment of Information and Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-5483
Claudia TestaINFN Bologna Division, Viale C. Berti Pichat, 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Ruifeng ZhuDepartment of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Caterina TononDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-499X
Raffaele LodiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
David Neil MannersFunctional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, 40139 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2404-1101

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202008320283Ministero della Salute (The publication of this article was supported by the "Ricerca Corrente" funding from the Italian Ministry of Health.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) networks have shown attractive performance in medical image processing tasks such as brain tumor classification. However, they are often criticized as mysterious "black boxes". The opaqueness of the model and the reasoning process make it difficult for health workers to decide whether to trust the prediction outcomes. In this study, we develop an interpretable multi-part attention network (IMPA-Net) for brain tumor classification to enhance the interpretability and trustworthiness of classification outcomes. The proposed model not only predicts the tumor grade but also provides a global explanation for the model interpretability and a local explanation as justification for the proffered prediction. Global explanation is represented as a group of feature patterns that the model learns to distinguish high-grade glioma (HGG) and low-grade glioma (LGG) classes. Local explanation interprets the reasoning process of an individual prediction by calculating the similarity between the prototypical parts of the image and a group of pre-learned task-related features. Experiments conducted on the BraTS2017 dataset demonstrate that IMPA-Net is a verifiable model for the classification task. A percentage of 86% of feature patterns were assessed by two radiologists to be valid for representing task-relevant medical features. The model shows a classification accuracy of 92.12%, of which 81.17% were evaluated as trustworthy based on local explanations. Our interpretable model is a trustworthy model that can be used for decision aids for glioma classification. Compared with black-box CNNs, it allows health workers and patients to understand the reasoning process and trust the prediction outcomes.

Indexed as

brain tumor classificationdecision supportdeep neural networksinterpretabilitymulti-part attentiontrustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID38786294
PMCPMC11119919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.