ReviewCells2024
Glioblastoma Phagocytic Cell Death: Balancing the Opportunities for Therapeutic Manipulation.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The importance of phagocytosis and its effect on the immune system.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Redefining the immune microenvironment of gliomas in the era of single-cell genomics.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Unlocking glioma vulnerabilities: targeting regulated cell death pathways for innovative therapies.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes: a new era in cardiac regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Is modulation of immune checkpoints on glioblastoma-infiltrating myeloid cells a viable therapeutic strategy?Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma.Cancer treatment and research · 2025Review
- Phagocytosis Checkpoints in Glioblastoma: CD47 and Beyond.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophages and microglia are professional phagocytes that sense and migrate toward "eat-me" signals. The role of phagocytic cells is to maintain homeostasis by engulfing senescent or apoptotic cells, debris, and abnormally aggregated macromolecules. Usually, dying cells send out "find-me" signals, facilitating the recruitment of phagocytes. Healthy cells can also promote or inhibit the phagocytosis phenomenon of macrophages and microglia by tuning the balance between "eat-me" and "don't-eat-me" signals at different stages in their lifespan, while the "don't-eat-me" signals are often hijacked by tumor cells as a mechanism of immune evasion. Using a combination of bioinformatic analysis and spatial profiling, we delineate the balance of the "don't-eat-me" CD47/SIRPα and "eat-me" CALR/STC1 ligand-receptor interactions to guide therapeutic strategies that are being developed for glioblastoma sequestered in the central nervous system (CNS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.