Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785877›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

How Mental Health and Suicidality Changed during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study in the General and Psychiatric Population Illustrating Risk and Protective Factors.

Mara Stockner, Barbara Plattner, Marco Innamorati, Alex Hofer, Iuliia Burian, Martin Fronthaler, Giancarlo Giupponi, Markus Huber, Christian Macina, Verena Perwanger and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mara StocknerFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Barbara PlattnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, General Hospital of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Marco InnamoratiDepartment of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-2290
Alex HoferDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Division of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5834-4258
Iuliia BurianDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Merano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39012 Merano, Italy.
Martin FronthalerTherapy Center Bad Bachgart, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39037 Rodengo, Italy.
Giancarlo GiupponiDepartment of Psychiatry, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, General Hospital of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Markus HuberDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Brunico, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39031 Brunico, Italy.
Christian MacinaDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Brunico, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39031 Brunico, Italy.
Verena PerwangerDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Merano, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39012 Merano, Italy.
Roger PychaDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bressanone, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39042 Bressanone, Italy.
Gerd SchallerDepartment of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Bressanone, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, 39042 Bressanone, Italy.
Andreas ConcaDepartment of Psychiatry, Sanitary Agency of South Tyrol, General Hospital of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in psychological distress in the general population, but contrasting results have been shown regarding its impact on psychological symptoms in clinical and non-clinical samples. Consequently, the aim of the present study was to compare in a longitudinal design (September-November 2020 and February-April 2021) the mental health outcomes of a clinical and a control sample and to determine the implications of various risk and protective factors in this regard. A total of 234 participants from the general population and 80 psychiatric patients took part in the present online study using the following measurements: the Brief Symptom Checklist (BSCL); Three-Item Loneliness Scale (TILS); Resilience Scale-13 (RS-13); and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale-Non-Illness (FACIT-Sp Non-Illness). The results show an overall decrease in active suicidal ideation as well as "peace", a subscale of spiritual well-being, as well as increases in passive suicidal activation in the clinical sample, which did not change in the control sample. Psychological symptoms did not significantly change in either group. Significant group effects show an increase in resilience in the clinical sample. Resilience and peace turned out to be protective factors for negative mental health outcomes. However, loneliness, which interestingly increased only in the control sample, was shown to be an overall potential risk factor. Our results highlight the complex implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health outcomes of different groups in the population, demonstrating the necessity of further research, specifically regarding the risk of active and passive suicidal activation. Highlighted protective factors are discussed in regards to spirituality (i.e., peace), which is not strictly related to religion but rather personal spirituality related to the meaning of situations of one's life, as well as in terms of mental health interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19mental healthpandemicresiliencespiritual well-beingsuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID38785877
PMCPMC11117826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.