Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785856›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Differences in Cold and Hot Decision-Making between Gambling and Other Addictions.

Sara Meca, Francisco Molins, Maragda Puigcerver, Miguel Ángel Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara MecaDepartment of Psychobiology, Universitat de València, Avenida Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Francisco MolinsDepartment of Psychobiology, Universitat de València, Avenida Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0211-9182
Maragda PuigcerverDepartment of Psychobiology, Universitat de València, Avenida Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Miguel Ángel SerranoDepartment of Psychobiology, Universitat de València, Avenida Blasco Ibañez, 21, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-4532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral and biological addictions can impair decision-making processes, mainly by means of a dysfunction in brain regions associated with reward and frontal areas that may lead to disadvantageous choices. Understanding these differences helps establish appropriate terminology and enhances our ability to recognize, prevent, and treat these disorders effectively. Thus, while behavioral and biological addictions share some common elements, their underlying mechanisms and impact on decision-making vary significantly. Moreover, decision-making can be measured through questionnaires (stable or "cold" measures) or dynamic tasks (hot decisions) such as the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which can reflect different dimensions of this process. The aim of this study was to compare decision-making from different perspectives-stable and dynamic measures-in patients with gambling addiction (GA) (

Indexed as

biological addictionscold decisionsdecision-makinggamblinghot decisionsIGT

Identifiers

PMID38785856
PMCPMC11117940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.