ArticleBiology2024
Correction: Satam et al. Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: Current Trends and Advancements.
Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights Into Spatial Transcriptomics: Exploring Recent Technical Developments and Their Diverse Applications.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- Comparison of 16S rRNA gene amplicon and whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing for subgingival oral microbiome profiling.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus.Scientific data · 2025Article
- NGS Approaches in Clinical Diagnostics: From Workflow to Disease-Specific Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chromosome defects and male factor infertility.Fertility and sterility · 2025Review
- Genomic and transcriptomic sequencing in prostate cancer.Current opinion in oncology · 2025Review
- Exploring the connection between RNA splicing and intellectual disability.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We are very thankful to the commentator for pointing out the issues in the review article by Satam et al [...].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.