Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785609›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Elicitation of Rank Correlations with Probabilities of Concordance: Method and Application to Building Management.

Benjamin Ramousse, Miguel Angel Mendoza-Lugo, Guus Rongen, Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin RamousseDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.
Miguel Angel Mendoza-LugoDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8488-1447
Guus RongenDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-9355
Oswaldo Morales-NápolesDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-4674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constructing Bayesian networks (BN) for practical applications presents significant challenges, especially in domains with limited empirical data available. In such situations, field experts are often consulted to estimate the model's parameters, for instance, rank correlations in Gaussian copula-based Bayesian networks (GCBN). Because there is no consensus on a 'best' approach for eliciting these correlations, this paper proposes a framework that uses probabilities of concordance for assessing dependence, and the dependence calibration score to aggregate experts' judgments. To demonstrate the relevance of our approach, the latter is implemented to populate a GCBN intended to estimate the condition of air handling units' components-a key challenge in building asset management. While the elicitation of concordance probabilities was well received by the questionnaire respondents, the analysis of the results reveals notable disparities in the experts' ability to quantify uncertainty. Moreover, the application of the dependence calibration aggregation method was hindered by the absence of relevant seed variables, thus failing to evaluate the participants' field expertise. All in all, while the authors do not recommend to use the current model in practice, this study suggests that concordance probabilities should be further explored as an alternative approach for the elicitation of dependence.

Indexed as

Bayesian networksbuilding maintenanceconcordance probabilitydependence calibrationexpert judgment

Identifiers

PMID38785609
PMCPMC11120366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.