ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024
Colorectal Cancer Detection via Metabolites and Machine Learning.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- SEFA: Semantic Embedding-Based Feature Augmentation of Biomedical Language-Model Embeddings Improves Interpretable Metabolomic Prediction of Lung Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Temporal Immune and Metabolic Shifts Drive the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of Resiquimod-Loaded Nanoparticles in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Metabolomics-Based Machine Learning Diagnostics of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Insights in Cancer Metabolomics: From Subtyping to Biomarker Discovery and Prognostic Modeling.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Metabolomic Exploration of Colorectal Cancer Through Amino Acids and Acylcarnitines Profiling of Serum Samples.Cancers · 2025Article
- The Role of NOL3 in Colon Adenocarcinoma Metastasis and Its Association With DNA Methylation.Human mutation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Today, colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis is performed using colonoscopy, which is the current, most effective screening method. However, colonoscopy poses risks of harm to the patient and is an invasive process. Recent research has proven metabolomics as a potential, non-invasive detection method, which can use identified biomarkers to detect potential cancer in a patient's body. The aim of this study is to develop a machine-learning (ML) model based on chemical descriptors that will recognize CRC-associated metabolites. We selected a set of metabolites found as the biomarkers of CRC, confirmed that they participate in cancer-related pathways, and used them for training a machine-learning model for the diagnostics of CRC. Using a set of selective metabolites and random compounds, we developed a range of ML models. The best performing ML model trained on Stage 0-2 CRC metabolite data predicted a metabolite class with 89.55% accuracy. The best performing ML model trained on Stage 3-4 CRC metabolite data predicted a metabolite class with 95.21% accuracy. Lastly, the best-performing ML model trained on Stage 0-4 CRC metabolite data predicted a metabolite class with 93.04% accuracy. These models were then tested on independent datasets, including random and unrelated-disease metabolites. In addition, six pathways related to these CRC metabolites were also distinguished: aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis; glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism; glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis; arginine biosynthesis; and alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. Thus, in this research study, we created machine-learning models based on metabolite-related descriptors that may be helpful in developing a non-invasive diagnosis method for CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.