Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Jennifer Wolf, Yiyuan Wu, Judy Hayek, Qi Zhang, Ioannis Alagkiozidis

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Analysis of the temporal changes in management of early-stage cervical cancer over a 10-year period in Germany: a multicenter retrospective analysis of the JAGO/NOGGO.Frontiers in oncology · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer WolfDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5859-8154

Yiyuan WuDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Judy HayekDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

Qi ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.

Ioannis AlagkiozidisDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial was published in 2018 and demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) yields inferior survival outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer compared to open surgery. This study investigates how the results of the LACC trial have impacted the selection of the primary treatment modality and adjuvant radiation utilization in early-stage cervical cancer. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we compared patients with stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer before (1/2016-12/2017) and after (1/2019-12/2020) the LACC trial. A total of 7930 patients were included: 4609 before and 3321 after the LACC trial. There was a decline in MIS usage from 67% pre-LACC to 35% thereafter (

Indexed as

Databases, FactualNeoplasm StagingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantUnited Statesadjuvant radiationcervical cancerLACCminimally invasive surgerypostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38785496

DOI10.3390/curroncol31050215

PMCPMC11119135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.